Ra-Ra-Rasputin (sorry, couldn't
resist)
There is a bookshop in Edinburgh called
Grant & Shaw, which conjures images of Liz Shaw poring over some
antique first edition only for Jo Grant to stumble in and spill coffee over it.
And if you think that's not funny, it's still more humour than you're likely to
encounter in The Wages of Sin, which relates the first joint enterprise
of those two characters - and the Doctor, of course - and whose cover informs
us that the contents are both 'gritty' and 'well-researched'. One would expect
no different from a David McIntee historical novel, driven by the impact of
Rasputin's imminent death on Russian history. But when the author's note inform
that pre-revolution Russia still used the Julian calendar, I resolved that that
particular well-researched factoid had better be relevant. Or else.
A problem with David's work is unattractive
prose - as if his diligent research and the necessity of constructing a plot
round it leave little time for the actual writing. Continuing the improvement
most evident in his shorter Degrees of Truth, with this political
thriller he has gone a long way toward addressing this and it transcends what I
still see as unimpressive presentation.
Only occasionally does David's worst habit -
untimely, unnecessary information dump - intrude. Characters
interrupting their own plot discussion to debate the etymology of the Russian
word for 'railway station' is the most stunning example, and what remains
infuriating about this is that it could so easily be avoided. However, though
this does detract from the novel as a whole, there's no denying that the story
is intriguing and the climax, in particular, is impressively tight - and David
did catch me out several times when I thought I'd picked up on something
unconvincing, such as the acceptance of a female scientist in 1916.
Written by David A McIntee |
Reviewed by David Darlington |
BBC Books Price: £4.99 |
Out: 1
February 1999 |
ISBN
0-5635-5567-X |
|
The calendar issue turned out to be unimportant
as I'd suspected - but that seemed less annoying since against expectations, I
quite enjoyed this book. Fans of David's work who find my criticism unduly
harsh could consider how it might be improved yet further with severe, critical
polishing.
|